← All exam updates
Study Strategy
How toppers read a mock scorecard (hint: the total is the least useful number)
2 August 2026 · TedQu Sigma desk
Two students score 120 in the same mock. One is three months from a great rank; the other is stuck. The difference is invisible in the total – and obvious in the breakdown. Here’s how strong candidates actually read a scorecard.
The four numbers that matter
- Accuracy per subject. 60 attempts at 55% accuracy is a negative-marking machine. Below ~70%, attempt fewer questions, not more.
- Time per question. Averages hide disasters: find the five questions that ate 25 minutes. They cost more than the ones you got wrong.
- Error type. Concept error, silly slip, or misread? Three different problems with three different fixes – relearn, drill, or slow down.
- Negative-marking impact. Compute your score with wrong answers simply skipped. The gap is your discipline tax.
The 40-minute rule
A mock without a 40-minute review is half a mock. The review isn’t rereading solutions – it’s logging every error by type and pushing the weak topics back into your revision queue.
The Sigma take
- Sigma’s 16 reports do this breakdown automatically after every attempt – subject accuracy, time-per-question, error patterns and negative-marking impact, with the backlog updated for you.